Hobbs v. Zhao et al
Filing
16
OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Frank H McCarthy ; denying 10 Motion to Compel (tjc, Dpty Clk)
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
BLAKE ROBERT HOBBS,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Case No.13-CV-673-CVE-FHM
RUI ZHAO, doing business as R&M
EXPRESS, and NORTHLAND
INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendants.
OPINION AND ORDER
Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel, [Dkt. 10], is DENIED. Defendant’s response to the
Motion to Compel asserts that the motion is moot. The time has long passed for filing a
reply and Plaintiff has not filed a reply brief challenging that assertion. The undersigned
therefore concludes that the motion should be denied.
SO ORDERED this 7th day of January, 2014.
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
