Marsh v. Long et al
OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Frank H McCarthy (Re: 21 Settlement Conference Order,, Setting/Resetting Deadline(s)/Hearing(s),, Ruling on Motion to Accelerate/Extend/Reset Settlement Deadline(s)/Conference, ) (tjc, Dpty Clk)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
DAVID LONG, et al.,
Case No. 15-CV-708-JHP-PJC
OPINION AND ORDER
Plaintiff has not complied with the court’s Settlement Conference Order, [Dkt. 21].
The court has called Plaintiff’s attorney’s office about the issue but Plaintiff’s attorney has
Plaintiff is hereby ordered to submit his Settlement Conference Statement by April
7, 2017. Plaintiff is advised that failure to comply with this Order may result in the dismissal
of this case. Plaintiff’s attorney is advised that failure to comply with this order may result
in a referral to the Committee on Admissions and Grievances.
SO ORDERED this 5th day of April, 2017.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?