Rice v. Just on Time Freight Systems, Inc. et al

Filing 32

OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Frank H McCarthy ; denying 31 Motion to Quash (tjc, Dpty Clk)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA RONNIE RICE, Plaintiff, v. JUST ON TIME FREIGHT SYSTEMS, INC., KENANI MAUTI OENDO, and BRYSON & ASSOCIATES, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 16-CV-524-GKF-FHM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff’s Motion to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum Issued by the Defendants, [Dkt. 31], is denied without prejudice for failure to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c)(1). If the parties are unable to resolve the issue after a good faith conference, Plaintiff may refile the motion specifically identifying the information claimed to be privileged or protected. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(5)(A) IT IS SO ORDERED this 8th day of March, 2017.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?