Carr v. Social Security Administration

Filing 36

OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Frank H McCarthy ; denying 22 Motion for Attorney Fees (sdc, Dpty Clk)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA WILLIE EARL CARR, Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 18-CV-272-FHM ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act, [Dkt. 22], is before the court for decision. The Tenth Circuit reversed the decision of this court and affirmed the administrative decision denying benefits. [Dkt. 33, 35] Accordingly, Plaintiff is not the prevailing party in this case and is not entitled to an award of attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 USC § 2412(d). Therefore, Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act, [Dkt. 22], is DENIED. SO ORDERED this 12th day of August, 2020.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?