Jackson v Astrue

Filing 31

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 28 and affirming the decision of the Commissioner. Signed by Honorable Vicki Miles-LaGrange on 9/24/2009. (ks)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA EDWARD JACKSON JIMENEZ, Plaintiff, vs. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CIV-08-1199-M ORDER On August 21, 2009, United States Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell issued a Report and Recommendation in this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security Administration. The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Commissioner's decision be affirmed. Plaintiff was advised of his right to object to the Report and Recommendation by September 10, 2009. On that date, plaintiff filed his objections. In his objections, plaintiff asserts the Commissioner did not apply the correct legal standards and that the substantial evidence in the record does not support the Commissioner, and hence, the Administrative Law Judge's ("ALJ") determinations. Specifically, plaintiff alleges that the ALJ did not properly call for a medical expert's testimony, and that the ALJ incorrectly evaluated plaintiff's back impairment. Having carefully reviewed the ALJ's decision, plaintiff's opening brief, the record in this case, and plaintiff's objection, the Court finds upon de novo review that the Commissioner properly applied the five-step sequential evaluation process, and the ALJ properly reviewed the Commissioner's decision in this respect. Furthermore, the Court finds that the correct legal standards were applied. Therefore, the Court finds the ALJ conducted a meaningful and wellsupported analysis of the medical evidence and did not fail in showing that his findings were based on substantive evidence. Accordingly, the Court: (1) (2) ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation issued by the Magistrate Judge on August 21, 2009, and AFFIRMS the decision of the Commissioner. IT IS SO ORDERED this 24th day of September, 2009.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?