Griffin v. Kastner

Filing 5

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Robert Griffin be denied and that he be ordered to pay the $5 filing fee. It is further recommended that this action be dismissed w/o prejudice unless Petitioner pays the $5 filing fee in full w/i 20 days of any order adopting this R&R. Objections to R&R due by 4/16/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bana Roberts on 3/27/2009. (bc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA ROBERT GRIFFIN, Petitioner, vs. PAUL A. KASTNER, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CIV-09-307-F REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Petitioner, a federal prisoner appearing pro se, has filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for writ of habeas corpus together with a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and supporting affidavit. Pursuant to an order entered by United States District Judge Stephen P. Friot, this matter has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge for initial proceedings consistent with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C). Having reviewed said motion, the undersigned finds that Petitioner has sufficient funds to prepay the filing fee of $5. Specifically, the record reflects that Petitioner has $324.06 in his prisoner accounts which money is available for the payment of the filing fees. Because Petitioner does not qualify for authorization to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee, it is recommended that Petitioner's motion [Doc. No. 2] be denied and that he be ordered to prepay the full $5 filing fee for this action to proceed. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). It is further recommended that this action be dismissed without prejudice to refiling unless Petitioner pays the $5 filing fee in full to the Clerk of the Court within twenty (20) days of any order adopting this Report and Recommendation. Petitioner is advised of his right to file an objection to this Report and Recommendation with the Clerk of this Court by the 16th day of April, 2009, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Local Civil Rule 72.1. Petitioner is further advised that failure to timely object to this Report and Recommendation waives the right to appellate review of both factual and legal issues contained herein. Moore v. United States, 950 F. 2d 656 (10th Cir. 1991). The Clerk is hereby directed not to forward a copy of the petition to the appropriate federal agency until further order of the Court. ENTERED this 27th day of March, 2009. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?