Duffy v. Franklin et al

Filing 11

ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations and Dismissing Case re 10 Report and Recommendation.. Signed by Honorable Timothy D. DeGiusti on 8/27/2009. (mb, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA ANDREW F. DUFFY, JR., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) JEFF FRANKLIN, Verden Police Chief, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) Case No. CIV-09-529-D ORDER OF DISMISSAL This matter is before the Court for review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Valerie K. Couch issued July 28, 2009, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and (C). Upon initial review of the Civil Rights Complaint Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983, Judge Couch recommends a dismissal under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted. Plaintiff, who appears pro se and in forma pauperis, has neither filed a timely objection to the Report nor requested additional time to object. The Court therefore finds Plaintiff has waived further review. See Moore v. United States, 950 F.2d 656, 659 (10th Cir. 1991); see also United States v. 2121 East 30th Street, 73 F.3d 1057, 1060 (10th Cir. 1996). Further, upon de novo consideration of the issues, the Court finds Judge Couch's analysis to be correct. Therefore, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 10] in its entirety. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the action is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). The dismissal shall count as a "prior occasion" or strike pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g) after Plaintiff has exhausted or waived his right to appeal. IT IS SO ORDERED this 27th day of August, 2009.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?