Ford v. GEO Inc

Filing 63

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; denying Dfts mtn to dism 60 and denying Plfs mtn for SJ. Signed by Honorable David L. Russell on 3/16/11. (ns, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA ERIC JUAN FORD, Plaintiff, v. GEO CORPORATION, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CIV-10-205-R ORDER Before the Court are two Reports and Recommendations entered by United States Magistrate Judge Robert E. Bacharach. Doc. Nos. 60 & 61. No objection to the Report and Recommendation on GEO Corporations' motion to dismiss [Doc. No. 60] has been filed nor has an extension of time in which to object to that Report and Recommendation been sought or granted. Therefore, the Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 60] is ADOPTED in its entirety and Defendant's motion to dismiss is DENIED. No objection to the Report and Recommendation on the Plaintiff's summary judgment motion [Doc. No. 61] has been filed nor has an extension of time to object that that Report and Recommendation been sought or granted. Therefore, the Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 61] is ADOPTED in its entirety and Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED this 16th day of March, 2011.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?