Apache Tribe of Oklahoma v. Brown et al

Filing 109

ORDER denying as moot 104 Motion to Dismiss; denying as moot 105 Motion to Dismiss; denying as moot 106 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Honorable Timothy D. DeGiusti on 6/8/2012. (mb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA APACHE TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA, Plaintiff, v. BETSY ANN BROWN, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CIV-10-646-D ORDER Before the Court are the following motions: Defendant Foshee & Yaffe Law Firm’s Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 104]; Defendants Betsy Ann Brown and Law Offices of Brown & Cullimore’s Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 105]; and Defendant John H. Graves’ Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 106]. All challenge the sufficiency of the original Complaint. However, on June 7, 2012, Plaintiff timely filed its Amended Complaint [Doc. No. 108].1 This amendment supersedes Plaintiff’s original pleading and renders it of no legal effect. See Davis v. TXO Prod. Corp.. 929 F.2d 1515, 1517 (10th Cir. 1991); see also Miller v. Glanz, 948 F.2d 1562, 1565 (10th Cir. 1991). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants’ Motions [Doc. Nos. 104, 105 & 106] are DENIED as moot without prejudice to resubmission, if appropriate, in response to the Amended Complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED this 8th day of June, 2012. 1 A plaintiff may amend as a matter of right within 21 days after service of a Rule 12(b) motion.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?