Berryhill v. Miles-LaGrange et al

Filing 12

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 6 ; plaintiff's motion for leave to procee in forma pauperis 2 is denied; plaintiff has until 10/20/2010 to pay the #350.00 filing fee or this action will be dismissed. Signed by Honorable Joe Heaton on 09/30/2010. (lam)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA LAVERN BERRYHILL, Plaintiff, vs. VICKI MILES-LaGRANGE, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER Plaintiff Lavern Berryhill, a state prisoner appearing pro se, filed this § 1983 action against numerous federal and state judges, federal and state employees and others, alleging violations of his constitutional rights. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C), the matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Bana Roberts for initial proceedings. She has recommended that plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis be denied and that he be required to pay the full $350.00 filing fee. She concluded that the three strikes provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) was applicable and that plaintiff had failed to demonstrate that the statute's imminent danger of serious physical injury exception applied. Although plaintiff amended his complaint after the Report and Recommendation was issued, the court has reviewed it and finds, as did the magistrate judge, that plaintiff "has made no credible allegation that he is presently in danger of serious physical injury." Report and NO. CIV-10-0802-HE Recommendation, p. 3. Plaintiff has filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation which the court has considered but does not find to be persuasive. Accordingly, the court adopts Magistrate Judge Robert's Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. #2] is denied. Plaintiff has until October 20, 2010, to pay the $350.00 filing fee or this action will be dismissed. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 30th day of September, 2010. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?