Fulton v. Astrue

Filing 17

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of Magistrate Judge Couch's Report and Recommendation Doc 16 and the Commissioner's decision is REVERSED and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this decision. Signed by Honorable Joe Heaton on 12/15/11. (pw, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA SCOTTY D. FULTON, Plaintiff, vs. MICHAEL 1. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CIV-10-1389-HE ORDER Plaintiff Scotty Fulton filed this case seeking judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration ("Commissioner") denying his application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income benefits. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(B), the case was referred to Magistrate Judge Valerie K. Couch. Judge Couch recommended the Commissioner's decision be reversed and remanded. Report and Recommendation [Doc. # 16]. Objections to Judge Couch's Report and Recommendation were due by November 18, 2011. The parties, having failed to object to the Report and Recommendation, waived their right to appellate review of the factual and legal issues it addressed. United States v. 2121 E. 30th St., 73 F.3d 1057, 1059 (lOth Cir. 1996); see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(C) ("A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made." (emphasis added)). The court therefore ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Couch's Report and Recommendation [Doc. #16], and the Commissioner's decision is REVERSED and the case REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this decision. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 15fh day of December, 2011. TON STATES DISTRlCT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?