Holtz v. Astrue

Filing 22

ORDER ADOPTING 19 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Signed by Honorable Robin J. Cauthron on 9/27/11. (lg, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
DEANNA K. HOLTZ,
Plaintiff,
vs.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
Commissioner of Social Security
Administration,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. CIV-11-18-C

ORDER AFFIRMING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
This action for judicial review of the Commissioner’s denial of disability insurance
benefits and supplemental security income benefits was referred for initial proceedings to
United States Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell, consistent with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).
Judge Purcell entered a Report and Recommendation on August 26, 2011, recommending
that the decision of the Commissioner be affirmed. Plaintiff, through counsel, has timely
filed an Objection, and the Court therefore considers the matter de novo.
In his thorough and well-reasoned Report and Recommendation, Judge Purcell sets
out the relevant facts and prevailing law, and no purpose would be served to repeat those
here. There is nothing asserted by the Plaintiff in her Objection which was not fully
considered and correctly rejected by the Magistrate Judge, and no argument of fact or law
is set forth in the Objection which would require a different result.

Accordingly, the Court adopts, in its entirety, the Report and Recommendation of the
Magistrate Judge, and for the reasons stated therein, the decision of the Commissioner is
affirmed. A judgment will enter accordingly.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 27th day of September, 2011.

2