Banks v. Warden of the Federal Transfer Center et al

Filing 36

ORDER ADOPTING 34 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Signed by Honorable Robin J. Cauthron on 3/5/12. (lg, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

FREDERICK BANKS,
Petitioner,
vs.
WARDEN OF THE FEDERAL
TRANSFER CENTER, et al.,
Respondents.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. CIV-11-201-C

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This action for habeas corpus relief brought by a prisoner, proceeding pro se, was
referred to United States Magistrate Judge Valerie K. Couch, consistent with the provisions
of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Judge Couch entered a Report and Recommendation on
February 15, 2012, to which Petitioner has timely objected. The Court therefore considers
the matter de novo.
The facts and relevant law are set out in full in the accurate and well-reasoned opinion
of the Magistrate Judge and no point would be served in repeating that analysis. In his
objection, Plaintiff raises no issue of law or fact that was not fairly addressed and correctly
decided by the Magistrate Judge.

Accordingly, the Court adopts, in its entirety, the Report and Recommendation of the
Magistrate Judge, and for the reasons announced therein, the petition for writ of habeas
corpus relief is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 5th day of March, 2012.

2