Sanders v. Ledezma

Filing 20

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 18 , denying the petition for writ of habeas corpus, denying petitioner's request for an evidentiary hearing, and denying 16 petitioner's motion for summary judgment rule 56. Signed by Honorable Vicki Miles-LaGrange on 9/26/2011. (ks)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA ANDREW DWAYNE SANDERS, Petitioner, v. H.A. LEDEZMA, Warden FCI El Reno, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CIV-11-391-M ORDER On September 7, 2011, United States Magistrate Judge Robert E. Bacharach issued a Report and Recommendation in this action brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, seeking a writ of habeas corpus. The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court: (1) deny petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus; (2) deny petitioner’s request for an evidentiary hearing; and (3) deny petitioner’s motion for summary judgment. Petitioner was advised of his right to object to the Report and Recommendation by September 26, 2011. On September 13, 2011, petitioner filed his objection. Upon de novo review, the Court: (1) ADOPTS the thorough and well-reasoned Report and Recommendation issued by the Magistrate Judge on September 7, 2011; (2) DENIES the petition for writ of habeas corpus; (3) DENIES petitioner’s request for an evidentiary hearing; and (4) DENIES petitioner’s Motion for Summary Judgment Rule 56 [docket no. 16]. IT IS SO ORDERED this 26th day of September, 2011.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?