Kerchee et al v. Smith et al

Filing 146

ORDER ADOPTING #111 #112 #114 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Signed by Honorable Robin J. Cauthron on 11/21/11. (lg, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA MELVIN KERCHEE, JR., and DEBORAH SEQUICHIE-KERCHEE, Plaintiffs, vs. JUDGE MARK SMITH, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CIV-11-459-C ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION This civil rights action brought by a prisoner, proceeding pro se, was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Robert E. Bacharach consistent with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1)(B). Judge Bacharach entered two Reports and Recommendations on October 24, 2011, and one on October 26, 2011, to which Plaintiff has timely objected. The Court therefore considers the matter de novo. The facts and relevant law are set out in full in the accurate and well-reasoned opinions of the Magistrate Judge and no point would be served in repeating that analysis. There is nothing asserted by Plaintiff which was not fully considered and correctly rejected by the Magistrate Judge, and no argument of fact or law is set forth in the objection which would require a different result. Accordingly, the Court adopts, in their entirety, the Reports and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt Nos. 11, 112 & 114), and for the reasons announced therein, the Motions to Dismiss of Defendants John Morris Williams (Dkt; No. 78), Loraine Farabow (Dkt. No. 37), and the Oklahoma Bar Association (Dkt. No. 38) are granted. As no amendment can cure the defects, these dismissals act as adjudications on the merits, and a judgment will enter at the conclusion of the case. This case is once again committed to the Magistrate Judge under the initial Order of Referral. IT IS SO ORDERED this 21st day of November, 2011. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?