Kerchee et al v. Smith et al

Filing 163

ORDER ADOPTING #27 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; denying #3 Plaintiff's Motion for the Court to Intervene. Signed by Honorable Robin J. Cauthron on 12/15/11. (lg, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA MELVIN KERCHEE, JR., and DEBORAH SEQUICHIE-KERCHEE, Plaintiffs, vs. JUDGE MARK SMITH, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CIV-11-459-C ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Magistrate Judge Bacharach has issued a Report and Recommendation, recommending denial of “Plaintiff’s Motion for the Court to Intervene, Stop, Prohibit Any More Retaliation, Confiscation of Legal Work and Material, Harassment, Transfer, Retalitory [sic] Transfer until Plaintiff’s [sic] Can Submit to this Court Their Preliminary Injunction and TRO” (Dkt. No. 3). The court file reflects that no party has objected to the Report and Recommendation within the time limits prescribed. Further, Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction has been filed and denied (Dkt Nos. 67, 87 & 116). Therefore, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted and the “Plaintiff’s Motion for the Court to Intervene, Stop, Prohibit Any More Retaliation, Confiscation of Legal Work and Material, Harassment, Transfer, Retalitory [sic] Transfer until Plaintiff’s [sic] Can Submit to this Court Their Preliminary Injunction and TRO” is denied. This matter is recommitted to the Magistrate Judge under the original Order of Referral. IT IS SO ORDERED this 15th day of December, 2011. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?