McDonald v. Oklahoma State of
Filing
19
ORDER ADOPTING 17 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Signed by Honorable Robin J. Cauthron on 11/29/11. (lg, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
RANDALL L. McDONALD,
Petitioner,
vs.
RODNEY REDMAN, WARDEN,
Respondent.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. CIV-11-879-C
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
This action for habeas corpus relief brought by a prisoner, proceeding pro se, was
referred to United States Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell, consistent with the provisions
of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).
Judge Purcell entered a Supplemental Report and
Recommendation on November 9, 2011, to which Petitioner has timely objected. The Court
therefore considers the matter de novo.
The facts and law are accurately set out in the Magistrate Judge’s Report and
Recommendation and there is no purpose to be served in repeating them yet again. In his
objection, Petitioner merely re-urges matters considered and properly rejected, and raises no
argument of fact or law which would suggest or permit a result contrary to that recommended
by the Magistrate Judge.
Accordingly, the Court adopts, in its entirety, the Report and Recommendation of the
Magistrate Judge (Dkt. No. 17), and for the reasons announced therein, the petition for
habeas corpus relief is dismissed as untimely. As no amendment can cure the defect, this
dismissal acts as an adjudication on the merits, and a judgment will enter.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 29th day of November, 2011.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?