McDonald v. Oklahoma State of
Filing
8
ORDER ADOPTING 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; dismissing case. Signed by Honorable Robin J. Cauthron on 9/21/11. (lg, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
RANDALL L. McDONALD,
Petitioner,
vs.
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, et al.,
Respondents.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. CIV-11-879-C
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
This action for habeas corpus relief brought by a prisoner, proceeding pro se, was
referred to United States Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell consistent with the provisions of
28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1)(B). On August 11, 2011, Judge Purcell entered a Report and
Recommendation concluding that because Petitioner had not paid the initial filing fee as
ordered, the action should be dismissed without prejudice. Petitioner has not filed an
objection.
Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation is adopted, and this action is dismissed
without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 21st day of September, 2011.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?