McDonald v. Oklahoma State of

Filing 8

ORDER ADOPTING 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; dismissing case. Signed by Honorable Robin J. Cauthron on 9/21/11. (lg, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA RANDALL L. McDONALD, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF OKLAHOMA, et al., Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CIV-11-879-C ORDER OF DISMISSAL This action for habeas corpus relief brought by a prisoner, proceeding pro se, was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell consistent with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1)(B). On August 11, 2011, Judge Purcell entered a Report and Recommendation concluding that because Petitioner had not paid the initial filing fee as ordered, the action should be dismissed without prejudice. Petitioner has not filed an objection. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation is adopted, and this action is dismissed without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED this 21st day of September, 2011.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?