Davis v. McCollum et al

Filing 15

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 14 of Magistrate Judge Robert Bacharach and the complaint is dismissed without prejudice...a separate judgment will be filed contemporaneously with this order. Signed by Honorable Joe Heaton on 08/20/2012. (lam)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA EZEKIEL DAVIS, Plaintiff, vs. TRACY MCCOLLUM, ET AL. Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CIV-12-0295-HE ORDER Plaintiff Ezekiel Davis, a state prisoner appearing pro se, filed this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Consistent with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), this matter was referred for initial proceedings to Magistrate Judge Robert E. Bacharach. Judge Bacharach has recommended that the complaint be dismissed without prejudice because plaintiff has failed to pay the required initial partial filing fee. Objections to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation were due by June 28, 2012. Plaintiff, having failed to object to the report and recommendation, has waived his right to review of the factual and legal issues it addressed. United States v. 2121 E. 30th St., 73 F.3d 1057, 1059 (10th Cir. 1996); see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) (“A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” (emphasis added)). Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation [Doc. #14] is ADOPTED and the complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. A separate judgment will be filed contemporaneously with this order. Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a). IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 20th day of August, 2012. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?