Vinson v. Astrue

Filing 19

ORDER ADOPTING 18 Report and Recommendation. The decision of the dft is REVERSED, & this matter is REMANDED to the dft for further administrative proceedings pursuant to sentence four of § 205(g) of the Social Security Act. Signed by Honorable Stephen P. Friot on 6/13/13. (llg)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA SHERRY VINSON, Plaintiff, -vsCAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CIV-12-844-F ORDER On May 22, 2013, United States Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell issued a Report and Recommendation, wherein she recommended that the defendant’s decision to deny plaintiff’s application for disability insurance benefits under the Social Security Act be reversed and that the matter be remanded for further administrative proceedings. Magistrate Judge Mitchell therein advised the parties of their right to object to the Report and Recommendation by June 12, 2013, and further advised the parties that failure to make a timely objection would result in a waiver of the right to appellate review. To date, no objection to the Report and Recommendation has been filed, and no request for an extension of time to object has been filed. With no objection being filed by either party within the time prescribed, the court accepts, adopts, and affirms the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell on May 22, 2013 (doc. no. 18) is ACCEPTED, ADOPTED, and AFFIRMED. The decision of defendant, Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, is REVERSED, and this matter is REMANDED to the defendant for further administrative proceedings pursuant to sentence four of § 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Judgment shall issue forthwith. DATED June 13, 2013. 12-0844p002.wpd 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?