Franklin v. Oklahoma State of et al
Filing
25
ORDER ADOPTING 23 Report and Recommendation, DENYING writ, DENYING certificate of appealability. Signed by Honorable Stephen P. Friot on 1/8/15. (llg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
CORTEZ L. FRANKLIN,
Petitioner,
vs.
ROBERT PATTON,
Respondent.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. CIV-12-0865-F
ORDER
Petitioner, a state prisoner appearing pro se, seeks habeas relief in this
action under 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254. Magistrate Judge Charles B. Goodwin entered
a detailed Report and Recommendation (the Report, doc. no. 23), recommending
that the petition be denied.
The Report advised the parties of their right to file an objection to the
recommendations contained in the Report by December 16, 2014. The Report
further advised that failure to timely object waives the right to appellate review
of both factual and legal issues contained in the Report. No objection has been
filed, and no request for an extension of time within which to object has been
filed.
With no objection having been filed, after review, and having concluded
that no purpose would be served by any further analysis here, the court
ACCEPTS, ADOPTS, and AFFIRMS the Report and Recommendation of the
magistrate judge. The writ is DENIED. A certificate of appealability is
DENIED.
Dated this 8th day of January, 2015.
12-0865p003.wpd
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?