Craddock v. McCollum et al

Filing 30

ORDER ADOPTING 28 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; mailed to Steven Glen Craddock, #278207, LEXINGTON-JHCC, P O Box 548, Lexington, OK 73051 . Signed by Honorable Robin J. Cauthron on 7/22/15. (lg)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

STEVEN GLEN CRADDOCK,
Petitioner,
vs.
CARL BEAR, Warden,
Respondent.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. CIV-12-1309-C

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
This action for habeas corpus relief brought by a prisoner, proceeding pro se, was
referred to United States Magistrate Judge Charles B. Goodwin consistent with the
provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).

Judge Goodwin entered a Report and

Recommendation on June 30, 2015, to which Petitioner has timely objected. The Court
therefore considers the matter de novo.
The facts and law are accurately set out in the Magistrate Judge’s Report and
Recommendation and there is no purpose to be served in repeating them yet again. In his
Objection, Petitioner ignores the limited review prescribed by 28 U.S.C. 2254(e)(1) and
argues theories of relief not previously raised and/or not supported by the authority cited.
There is no argument of fact or law which would require or even permit a different outcome
than that recommended by Judge Goodwin.

Accordingly, the Court adopts, in its entirety, the Report and Recommendation of the
Magistrate Judge, and for the reasons announced therein, denies this petition for habeas
corpus relief. A judgment will enter accordingly.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 22nd day of July, 2015.

2