Carbone v. Sandridge Energy Inc et al

Filing 44

ORDER. The Court ORDERS that this action shall be and is hereby closed. Signed by Judge Charles Goodwin on 03/31/2023. (jb)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA IN RE SANDRIDGE ENERGY, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CIV-12-1341-G ORDER On March 6, 2013, the Court consolidated two related actions, Glitz v. SandRidge Energy, Inc., Case No. CIV-12-1341 (W.D. Okla.) (“Glitz”), and Carbone v. SandRidge Energy, Inc., Case No. CIV-13-19 (W.D. Okla.) (“Carbone”), pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42, on the basis that the two actions involved “involve[d] a common question of law or fact.” Order of Mar. 6, 2013 (Doc. No. 60 (Glitz) at 3; Doc. No. 35 (Carbone) at 3). The Court designated the consolidated action In re Sandridge Energy, Inc. Securities Litigation, Case No. CIV-12-1341 (W.D. Okla.), and ordered that all pleadings and papers thereafter were to be filed exclusively in Case No. CIV-12-1341. See Order of Mar. 6, 2013, at 3. On December 30, 2022, the Court entered judgment as to Defendants Tom L. Ward, James D. Bennett, and Matthew K. Grubb in the consolidated action. See J. (Doc. No. 593). On today’s date, the Court entered Judgment as to Defendant SandRidge Energy, Inc., terminating the final remaining claim in the consolidated action. In accordance with the Court’s consolidation Order and the Judgments entered in the consolidated action, the Court ORDERS that the Carbone action, Case No. CIV-13-19, shall be and is hereby closed. IT IS SO ORDERED this 31st day of March, 2023. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?