Tenison v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al

Filing 35

ORDER ADOPTING 34 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Signed by Honorable Robin J. Cauthron on 9/24/14. (lg)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA DAMEA S. TENISON, Plaintiff, vs. OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CIV-13-110-C ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation entered by United States Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin on August 18, 2014. The court file reflects that no party has objected to the Report and Recommendation within the time limits prescribed. Therefore, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted and the Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 24), filed by Defendants Morton, Knutson, and McCoy is granted; Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 27), filed by Defendants Miller, Jones, and Roof is granted; Plaintiff’s claims against the Oklahoma Department of Corrections are dismissed with prejudice under the Eleventh Amendment, and Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Corrections Corporation of America and Cimarron Correctional Facility are dismissed. Plaintiff’s “Motion to Rebuttal Defendant’s Motion” (Dkt. No. 32), and his “Motion to Settlement” (Dkt. No. 33) are denied as moot. A judgment shall enter accordingly. IT IS SO ORDERED this 24th day of September, 2014. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?