Jones v. Cannon et al
Filing
45
ORDER ADOPTING 43 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Signed by Honorable Robin J. Cauthron on 3/26/14. (lg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
MARK EDWIN JONES,
Plaintiff,
vs.
JEREMY CANNON;
JENNIFER COLLISON; and
WOODWARD COUNTY JAIL,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. CIV-13-302-C
ORDER
This civil rights action brought by a prisoner, proceeding pro se, was referred to
United States Magistrate Judge Charles B. Goodwin, consistent with the provisions of 28
U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Judge Goodwin entered a Report and Recommendation on March
5, 2014, to which Plaintiff has timely objected. The Court therefore considers the matter de
novo.
The facts and law are accurately set out in the Magistrate Judge’s Report and
Recommendation and there is no purpose to be served in repeating them yet again. In his
objection, Plaintiff merely restates the conclusions and legal argument originally asserted,
and raises no issue not fully and accurately addressed and rejected by the Magistrate Judge.
Accordingly, the Court adopts, in its entirety, the Report and Recommendation of the
Magistrate Judge, and for the reasons announced therein, Defendants’ dispositive motions
(Dkt. Nos. 21, 23, 31) are granted and Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No.
29) is denied. Because of the legal insufficiency of Plaintiff’s arguments, any amendment
with respect to the Woodward County Jail would be futile and his request therefor is denied.
A judgment will enter accordingly.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 26th day of March, 2014.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?