Smith v. Oklahoma County Probation Board

Filing 8

ORDER ADOPTING 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; denied as moot 7 MOTION to Enforce Discovery filed by Nicois Megale Smith. Signed by Honorable Robin J. Cauthron on 5/14/13. (lg)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

NICOIS MEGALE SMITH,
Petitioner,
vs.
OKLAHOMA COUNTY PROBATION
BOARD,
Respondent.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. CIV-13-365-C

ORDER AFFIRMING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This action for habeas corpus relief brought by a prisoner, proceeding pro se, was
referred to United States Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell, consistent with the provisions
of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Judge Mitchell entered a Report and Recommendation on April
19, 2013, to which Petitioner has timely objected. The Court therefore considers the matter
de novo.
The facts and law are accurately set out in the Magistrate Judge’s Report and
Recommendation and there is no purpose to be served in repeating them yet again. In
objection, Petitioner attaches a number of statements and affidavits, but fails to address the
Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, that the Petition should be dismissed for failure
to exhaust state remedies. Thus, there is no dispute as to the recommended resolution.
Accordingly, the Court adopts, in its entirety, the Report and Recommendation of the
Magistrate Judge (Dkt. No. 6), and for the reasons announced therein, this petition for habeas

corpus relief is dismissed without prejudice. Petitioner’s Motion to Enforce Discovery (Dkt.
No. 7) is denied as moot. A judgment will enter.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 14th day of May, 2013.

2