Darden v. Wilkinson

Filing 24

ORDER ADOPTING 20 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Signed by Honorable Robin J. Cauthron on 11/13/14. (lg)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
CHARLES DARDEN,
Petitioner,
vs.
ROBERT PATTON, Director,
Oklahoma Department of Corrections,
Respondent.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. CIV-13-392-C

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
This action for habeas corpus relief brought by a prisoner, proceeding pro se, was referred
to United States Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin, consistent with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b)(1)(B). Judge Erwin entered a Report and Recommendation on September 30, 2014, to
which Petitioner has timely objected. The Court therefore considers the matter de novo.
Petitioner’s Objection appears to raise a new argument, but in any event, the Court is
satisfied there is no dispute of fact and the Magistrate Judge has applied the correct rules of law.
Petitioner, under any theory, is not entitled to the relief he seeks.
Accordingly, the Court adopts, in its entirety, the Report and Recommendation of the
Magistrate Judge, and for the reasons announced therein, denies this petition for habeas corpus
relief. A judgment will enter accordingly.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 13th day of November, 2014.