Riley v. Addison
Filing
7
ORDER ACCEPTING and AFFIRMING 5 Report and Recommendation w/the modification stated below re ddl for pymt of filing fee, DENYING 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Anthony Wayne Riley, GRANTING 6 Application for Extensi on of Time filed by Anthony Wayne Riley. Petitioner's ddl for pymt of the filing fee is EXTENDED to 5/31/13. Absent further extension, failure to timely pay the filing fee will result in dismissal of this action w/o prejudice. Signed by Honorable Stephen P. Friot on 5/28/13. (llg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
ANTHONY WAYNE RILEY,
Petitioner,
vs.
MIKE ADDISON, Warden,
Respondent.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. CIV-13-0397-F
ORDER
Petitioner has not objected to the magistrate judge’s recommended findings that
petitioner be denied in forma pauperis status, that petitioner be required to pay the
filing fee, and that absent payment this action be dismissed. Petitioner does, however,
ask the court for an extension of the date for payment of the filing fee until May 31,
2013, and has for that purpose has filed an “Application for Extension of Time to Pay
Filing Fee.” Doc. no. 6.
After review, and with no objection having been filed, the Report and
Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Purcell, doc. no. 5, is ACCEPTED and
AFFIRMED with the MODIFICATION stated below regarding the deadline for
payment of the filing fee.
Petitioner’s request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, doc. no. 2, is
DENIED.
Petitioner’s application for an extension is GRANTED. For good cause shown,
the date stated in the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation for payment of
the filing fee is EXTENDED to May 31, 2013, as requested by petitioner.
Absent a further extension, failure to timely pay the filing fee will result in
dismissal of this action without prejudice, as recommended by the magistrate judge.
Dated this 28th day of May, 2013.
13-0397p001.wpd
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?