Stevens v. Pruitt

Filing 17

ORDER ADOPTING 15 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Signed by Honorable Robin J. Cauthron on 11/13/13. (lg)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

JERRI DARLENE STEVENS,
Petitioner,
vs.
RICKEY MOHAM, Warden,
Respondent.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. CIV-13-433-C

ORDER AFFIRMING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
This action for habeas corpus relief brought by a prisoner, proceeding pro se, was
referred to United States Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell, consistent with the provisions
of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Judge Purcell entered a Report and Recommendation on
October 22, 2013, to which Petitioner has timely objected. The Court therefore considers the
matter de novo.
The facts and law are accurately set out in the Magistrate Judge’s Report and
Recommendation and there is no purpose to be served in repeating them yet again. In her
objection, Petitioner merely restates the conclusions and legal argument originally asserted.
There is nothing asserted by the Petitioner which was not fully considered and correctly
rejected by the Magistrate Judge, and no argument of fact or law is set forth in the objection
which would require a different result.

Accordingly, the Court adopts, in its entirety, the Report and Recommendation of the
Magistrate Judge, and for the reasons announced therein, denies this petition for habeas
corpus relief. A judgment will enter accordingly.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 13th day of November, 2013.

2