Walls v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
17
ORDER ADOPTING 16 Report and Recommendation, AFFIRMING the Commissioner's decision denying benefits. Signed by Honorable Stephen P. Friot on 6/20/14. (llg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
TAMMY WALLS,
Plaintiff,
vs.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting
Commissioner of the Social Security
Administration,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. CIV-13-0727-F
ORDER
Plaintiff Tammy Walls brings this action seeking judicial review pursuant to 42
U.S.C. §405(g) of the final decision of the defendant Commissioner denying
plaintiff’s applications for disability insurance and supplemental security income
benefits under Title II and Title XVI of the Social Security Act. Magistrate Judge
Gary M. Purcell issued a Report and Recommendation on May 29, 2014, doc. no. 16
(the Report), recommending that the Commissioner’s decision be affirmed. The
Report advised the parties of their right to file written objections to the Report and
Recommendation by June 18, 2014. The Report also advised that failure to make
timely objection to the Report waives appellate review of the recommended ruling.
Neither party has filed an objection to the Report, and neither party has requested an
extension of time within which to file any objection to the Report.
With no objection being filed, and having reviewed the Report, the record, and
the relevant arguments and authorities, the court finds that no purpose would be
served by setting out any further analysis here and that the Report should be adopted
in its entirety.
The court ACCEPTS, AFFIRMS, and ADOPTS the findings and
recommendations of the Magistrate Judge as stated in the Report.
Commissioner’s decision denying benefits is AFFIRMED.
Dated this 20th day of June, 2014.
13-0727p002.wpd
-2-
The
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?