Alley v. Cain et al

Filing 7

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, the Court ADOPTS the 6 Report and Recommendation; DENIES Alley's 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; and DISMISSES this matter w/o prej to refiling. Signed by Honorable Lee R. West on 10/8/13. (ap)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Fcf ILED THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA CHARLEY D. ALLEY, Plaintiff, vs. GENE CAIN et al.. Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) OCT - 8 2013 R BERT D. DEN CLERK O NIS, U.S OIST. COURT. WESTERN 0151 OF OKlA . BY DEPUTY w.Pk No. CIV-13-737-W ORDER On September 17, 2013, United States Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin issued a Report and Recommendation in this matter and recommended that the Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis filed by plaintiff Charley D. Alley be denied. Magistrate Judge Erwin further recommended that this matter be dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with his Order issued on July 19. 2013, directing Alley to cure the defective Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. Alley was advised of his right to object, see Doc. 6 at 2, but no objections have been filed within the allotted time. Upon review of the record, the Court concurs with Magistrate Judge Erwin's suggested disposition of Alley's request to proceed without prepayment of fees and costs. Because Alley not only has failed to comply with Magistrate Judge Erwin's Order [Doc. 5] of July 19, 2013, but also has shown no indication that he intends to prosecute this matter, the Court further concurs with Magistrate Erwin's recommendation that this matter be dismissed without prejudice. Accordingly, the Court (1) ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 6] issued on September 17, 2013; (2) DENIES Alley's Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis [Doc. 2] fileĀ­ stamped July 17, 2013; and (3) DISMISSES this matter without prejudice to refiling. ENTERED this ~ day of October, 2013. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?