Alamiin a/k/a James Shockey v. Jones et al

Filing 10

ORDER ADOPTING 8 Report and Recommendation, CONSTRUING 9 Motion for Reconsideration filed by Wahiid M Alamiin a/k/a James Shockey as plf's objection to the R&R, DENYING 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Wahiid M Alamiin a/k/a James Shockey, DENYING 7 Motion for Order filed by Wahiid M Alamiin a/k/a James Shockey. Plf is required to pay the full filing fee w/i 21 days of this order. Absent pymt or a showing of good cause for failure to do so, this acti on will be dismissed w/o prejudice. As stated in the R&R, the magistrate judge will inform the agency having custody of plf of this ct's orders & of the R&R. The magistrate judge will advise the agency that it is expected to act in accordance with this ct's orders to facilitate submission of the required filing fee on a timely basis. This action remains referred to the magistrate judge. Signed by Honorable Stephen P. Friot on 11/8/13. (llg)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
WAHIID M. ALAMIIN a/k/a JAMES
SHOCKEY,
Plaintiff,
vs.
JUSTIN JONES, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. CIV-13-1001-F

ORDER
Plaintiff has filed a motion to reconsider the Report and Recommendation (the
Report) of Magistrate Judge Charles B. Goodwin. Motion to reconsider at doc. no.
9. Plaintiff appears pro se and his pleadings are liberally construed. Accordingly,
upon review, plaintiff’s motion to reconsider is construed as an objection to the
recommended rulings in the Report.
The Report recommends denial of plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma
pauperis, doc. no. 2, and denial of plaintiff’s motion for order directing action, doc.
no. 7. Having reviewed plaintiff’s objections and the Report de novo, the court finds
that the Report should be adopted in its entirety and that no further purpose would be
served by any further analysis here.
Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation at doc. no. 8 is ACCEPTED,
ADOPTED and AFFIRMED, and plaintiff’s motions at doc. nos. 2 and 7 are
DENIED. As recommended in the Report, plaintiff is required to pay the full filing
fee within twenty-one days of this order. Absent payment or a showing of good cause
for failure to do so, this action will be dismissed without prejudice. As stated in the
Report, the magistrate judge will inform the agency having custody of plaintiff of this

court’s orders and of the Report and Recommendation. The magistrate judge will
advise the agency that it is expected to act in accordance with this court’s orders to
facilitate submission of the required filing fee on a timely basis.
This action remains referred to the magistrate judge.
Dated this 8th day of November, 2013.

13-1001p001.wpd

-2-