Bishop v. Talley et al

Filing 11

ORDER ADOPTING 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Signed by Honorable Robin J. Cauthron on 8/22/14. (lg)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
ADRIAN DESJUAN BISHOP,
Plaintiff,
vs.
SAM TALLEY, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case Number CIV-14-561-C

ORDER
This civil rights action brought by a prisoner, proceeding pro se, was referred to
United States Magistrate Judge Charles B. Goodwin, consistent with the provisions of 28
U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Judge Goodwin entered a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) on
July 21, 2014, recommending dismissal without prejudice for failure to comply with Court
orders regarding the Complaint and in forma pauperis application.
Plaintiff has not filed Objections to the R&R, exactly, but has filed what he calls
“Sworn under Penalty Charges” where he seems to ask to be instructed what to do and
promises to do it. The problem with Plaintiff’s submission is that he was told exactly what
to do in Judge Goodwin’s Order of June 3, 2014 (Dkt. No. 7), and if has made any effort to
do it, it is not apparent from the file. So, Plaintiff has either failed to object to the R&R or
his objections, if the “Sworn under Penalty Charges” may be treated as such, are totally
without merit.
Accordingly, the Court adopts, in its entirety, the Report and Recommendation of the
Magistrate Judge, and for the reasons announced therein, this petition for habeas corpus relief

is dismissed without prejudice. All pending motions, including the Writ of Mandamus, are
stricken.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 22nd day of August, 2014.

2