Stevens v. Farris et al

Filing 14

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for 13 Report and Recommendation. With no objection having been filed, after review, and having concluded that no purpose would be served by any further analysis here, the court ACCEPTS, ADOPTS, and AFFIRMS the Report and Recommendation of the magistrate judge. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Stephen P. Friot on 3/30/16. (kr)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
BRADLEY KEITH STEVENS,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Petitioner,
-vsJIM FARRIS, Warden,
Respondent.

Case No. CIV-14-0705-F

ORDER
Petitioner, a state prisoner appearing pro se, seeks habeas relief in this action
under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin entered a Report and
Recommendation (the Report, doc. no. 13), recommending the petition be denied.
The Report advised the parties of their right to file an objection to the
recommendations contained in the Report by March 17, 2016. The Report further
advised that failure to timely object waives the right to appellate review of both
factual and legal issues contained in the Report. No objection has been filed, and no
request for an extension of time within which to object has been filed.
With no objection having been filed, after review, and having concluded that
no purpose would be served by any further analysis here, the court ACCEPTS,
ADOPTS, and AFFIRMS the Report and Recommendation of the magistrate judge.
The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. A certificate of
appealability is DENIED.
Dated this 30th day of March, 2016.

14-705p001.wpd