Greer v. Dowling et al

Filing 180

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 169 and denying 140 plaintiff's "Motion Requesting an Order for Injunctive Relief, Directing ODOC Officials, to Allow Plaintiff to Use Facility Law Library Computer/Word Processor, Cease and Desi st Their Ongoing Retaliation against Plaintiff" and 143] plaintiff's "Motion Requesting an Emergency Preliminary Injunction/Temporary Restraining Order, Prohibiting Destruction of, and Removal of Plaintiff's Legal Work and Research Materials". Signed by Honorable Vicki Miles-LaGrange on 9/28/2017. (ks)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA TRAVIS LEMARR GREER, Plaintiff, vs. JANET DOWLING, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CIV-14-708-M ORDER On May 26, 2017, United States Magistrate Judge Charles B. Goodwin issued a Report and Recommendation in this case. The Magistrate Judge recommended that plaintiff’s motions for preliminary injunction be denied. The parties were advised of their right to object to the Report and Recommendation by June 16, 2017. After receiving various extensions of time, plaintiff has filed his responses and objections. The Court has carefully reviewed this matter de novo. Upon review, the Court: (1) ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation [docket no. 169] issued by the Magistrate Judge on May 26, 2017, and (2) DENIES plaintiff’s “Motion Requesting an Order for Injunctive Relief, Directing ODOC Officials, to Allow Plaintiff to Use Facility Law Library Computer/Word Processor, Cease and Desist Their Ongoing Retaliation against Plaintiff” [docket no. 140] and plaintiff’s “Motion Requesting an Emergency Preliminary Injunction/Temporary Restraining Order, Prohibiting Destruction of, and Removal of Plaintiff’s Legal Work and Research Materials” [docket no. 143]. IT IS SO ORDERED this 28th day of September, 2017.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?