Hillard v. Bauman

Filing 13

ORDER ADOPTING 11 Report and Recommendation, DISMISSING WITHOUT PREJUDICE as moot 1 Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 USC § 2241. Signed by Honorable Stephen P. Friot on 10/9/14. (llg)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA ROBERT S. HILLARD, Petitioner, -vsJIM BAUMAN, Logan County, Sheriff, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CIV-14-838-F ORDER United States Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell issued a Report and Recommendation, recommending that petitioner, Robert S. Hillard’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 be dismissed without prejudice as moot. Magistrate Judge Mitchell found that because respondent, Jim Bauman, no longer has custody of petitioner, he is powerless to provide any relief the court might order. Magistrate Judge Mitchell also found that because petitioner is now being held in Nebraska, outside the district of confinement, he is outside of this court’s habeas jurisdiction. Petitioner has timely objected to Magistrate Judge Mitchell’s Report and Recommendation. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the court has conducted a de novo review of the matter. Having done so, the court concurs with the analysis and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Mitchell. The court finds that petitioner’s § 2241 petition should be dismissed without prejudice as moot. Griffin v. Kastner, 507 Fed. Appx. 801, 802-803 (10th Cir. 2013). Therefore, the court accepts, adopts and affirms the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell issued on September 18, 2014 (doc. no. 11) is ACCEPTED, ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. Petitioner, Robert S. Hillard’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as moot. Judgment shall issue forthwith. DATED October 9, 2014. 14-0838p001.wpd 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?