Pardue v. Rural Community Insurance Company et al
Filing
23
ORDER granting 22 Motion to Strike Dismissal Without Prejudice 6 AMENDED MOTION to Dismiss MOTION to Compel Arbitration MOTION to Stay Case re 5 MOTION to Dismiss MOTION to Compel Arbitration MOTION to S tay Case MOTION for Extension of Time MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer , 7 Brief. Plaintiff is directed to file the corrected dismissal within 5 days. Signed by Honorable Timothy D. DeGiusti on 10/17/2014. (mb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
WILL PARDUE,
Plaintiff,
vs.
RURAL COMMUNITY
INSURANCE COMPANY and
HUMBLE INSURANCE AGENCY
Defendants,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. CIV-14-1049-D
ORDER
Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice [Doc.
No. 22]. The record shows that on October 8, 2014, Plaintiff filed a Dismissal Without Prejudice
[Doc. No. 21] purporting to voluntarily dismiss his claims against all Defendants pursuant to Fed.
R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). Plaintiff now states that he inadvertently included Defendant Humble
Insurance Company (Humble) in the dismissal and that he only intended to dismiss Defendant Rural
Community Insurance Company (Rural). Plaintiff requests that the Court strike the dismissal and
allow Plaintiff the opportunity to re-file a corrected dismissal only as to Defendant Rural.1
Generally a dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) is automatic and divests the Court of
jurisdiction. See, e.g., Janssen v. Harris, 321 F.3d 998, 1000-01 (10th Cir. 2003) (recognizing that
a dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1)(i) (restyled in 2007 as Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i)) does not require an order
of the court and is effective on the date it is filed). However, Plaintiff’s attempted voluntary
1
Although Fed.R.Civ.P. 41 speaks of dismissal of actions, numerous court have recognized that the rule can
be used to dismiss all claims against one defendant even where the action proceeds against other defendants. See 9
Wright & Miller Federal Practice and Procedure: Civil 3d § 2362 (in an action with multiple defendants, voluntary
dismissal of all claims against a single defendant is permitted as “the sounder view” and followed by the “weight of
judicial authority”) see also Southcrest, L.L.C. v. Bovis Lend Lease, Inc., Case No. 10-CV-0362-CVE, 2011 WL
1793388 at **3-4 (N.D. Okla. May 11, 2011) (unpublished op.) (setting forth cases, noting Tenth Circuit has not
addressed the issue, but following the majority approach).
dismissal of Defendant Humble is invalid because Humble has filed an Answer [Doc. No. 12]. Rule
41(a)(1)(A)(i) permits a plaintiff to dismiss an action without a court order so long as the plaintiff
files a notice of dismissal “before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for
summary judgment.” Id. (emphasis added). Because Humble has already filed its answer, the
provisions of Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) do not apply to it and the Court has not lost jurisdiction over the
action as to Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Humble.
The record further reflects that Defendant Rural has filed an Amended Motion to Dismiss
[Doc. Nos. 6-7]. That filing does not prevent Plaintiff’s voluntary dismissal of his claims against
Rural. See, e.g., In re Bath and Kitchen Fixtures Antitrust Litigation, 535 F.3d 161, 166 (3d Cir.
2008) (“Because a motion to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) is neither an answer nor a
motion for summary judgment, its filing generally does not cut off a plaintiff’s right to dismiss by
notice.”). Under these circumstances, the Court finds Plaintiff should be granted the relief requested.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Dismissal Without
Prejudice [Doc. No. 22] is GRANTED. Plaintiff is granted leave to file a corrected voluntary
dismissal without prejudice as to only Defendant Rural Community Insurance Company. Plaintiff
is directed to file the corrected dismissal within five (5) days of the date of this Order. The corrected
voluntary dismissal will be deemed effective as of October 8, 2014.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 17th day of October, 2014.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?