Ali v. Jones et al

Filing 187

ORDER ADOPTING 180 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; mailed to Murtaza Ali #78888745 HASKELL-RPRJDC P O Box 877 Haskell, TX 79521. Signed by Honorable Robin J. Cauthron on 1/30/17. (lg)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA MURTAZA ALI, Plaintiff, vs. JAMES DRAWBRIDGE, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CIV-14-1174-C ORDER ADOPTING SIXTH SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION This civil rights action brought by a former state prisoner, proceeding pro se, was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell, consistent with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Judge Purcell entered his Sixth Report and Recommendation on December 22, 2016, to which Plaintiff has timely objected. The Court therefore considers the matter de novo. The facts and law are accurately set out in the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation and there is no purpose to be served in repeating them yet again. In his objection, Plaintiff raises no issue not fully and accurately addressed and rejected by the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, the Court adopts, in its entirety, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and for the reasons announced therein, Defendant Robert Denton’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 141) and Defendants Leo Brown and James (Jay) Drawbridge’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 142) are DENIED as to the issue of exhaustion of administrative remedies and GRANTED as to Plaintiff’s remaining claims against them. A judgment will enter accordingly. IT IS SO ORDERED this 30th day of January, 2017. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?