Ali v. Jones et al
Filing
187
ORDER ADOPTING 180 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; mailed to Murtaza Ali #78888745 HASKELL-RPRJDC P O Box 877 Haskell, TX 79521. Signed by Honorable Robin J. Cauthron on 1/30/17. (lg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
MURTAZA ALI,
Plaintiff,
vs.
JAMES DRAWBRIDGE, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. CIV-14-1174-C
ORDER ADOPTING SIXTH SUPPLEMENTAL
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
This civil rights action brought by a former state prisoner, proceeding pro se, was
referred to United States Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell, consistent with the provisions
of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Judge Purcell entered his Sixth Report and Recommendation
on December 22, 2016, to which Plaintiff has timely objected. The Court therefore considers
the matter de novo.
The facts and law are accurately set out in the Magistrate Judge’s Report and
Recommendation and there is no purpose to be served in repeating them yet again. In his
objection, Plaintiff raises no issue not fully and accurately addressed and rejected by the
Magistrate Judge.
Accordingly, the Court adopts, in its entirety, the Report and Recommendation of the
Magistrate Judge, and for the reasons announced therein, Defendant Robert Denton’s Motion
for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 141) and Defendants Leo Brown and James (Jay)
Drawbridge’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 142) are DENIED as to the issue of
exhaustion of administrative remedies and GRANTED as to Plaintiff’s remaining claims
against them. A judgment will enter accordingly.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 30th day of January, 2017.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?