Wallace v. Addison

Filing 8

ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 5 Report and Recommendation.; denying 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Case re-referred to Judge Purcell (mb)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
EDDIE WALLACE,
Petitioner,
v.
MICHAEL K. ADDISON, Warden,
Respondent.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. CIV-14-1245-D

ORDER
This matter is before the Court for review of the Report and Recommendation issued
by United States Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell on November 12, 2014. Judge Purcell
recommends the denial of Petitioner’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP)
because he has sufficient financial resources to pay the $5.00 filing fee for his Petition.
Petitioner has not filed a timely objection but, instead, has paid the required fee. Thus, the
Court finds that Petitioner’s IFP motion is moot.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 5]
is ADOPTED, and Petitioner’s IFP motion [Doc. No. 2] is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter, to include Petitioner’s Motion to
Supplement Habeas Petition [Doc. No. 6], is re-referred to Judge Purcell for further
proceedings consistent with the initial case referral.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 4th day of December, 2014.