Sanborn v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 23

ORDER ADOPTING 20 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; affirms the Commissioner's decision to deny Sanborn's Applications for Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income; orders that judgment in favor of the Commissioner issue forthwith. Signed by Honorable Lee R. West on 12/23/2015. (jb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA TROY SANBORN, Plaintiff, ) vs. ) No. CIV-14-1342-W CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ORDER On October 26, 2015, United States Magistrate Judge Bernard M. Jones issued a Report and Recommendation in this matter and recommended that the decision of the defendant, Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security ("Commissioner"), to deny disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income to plaintiff Troy Sanborn be affirmed. Sanborn was advised of his right to object to the Report and Recommendation, s ^ Doc. 20 at 20, and the matter now comes before the Court on Sanborn's Objection to the Magistrate's Report and Recommendation [Doc. 21] and the Commissioner's Response to Plaintiffs Objection to the Magistrate's Report and Recommendation [Doc. 22]. Upon de novo review of those findings challenged by Sanborn, the Court concurs with Magistrate Judge Jones' suggested disposition of this matter. The Commissioner's relevant factual findings are supported by substantial evidence in light of the entire record, and she applied the correct legal standards. E.g.. O'Dellv. Shalala. 44 F.3d 855, 858 (lO**" Cir. 1994). Accordingly, the Court (1) ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 20] issued on October 26, 2015; (2) AFFIRMS the Commissioner's decision to deny Sanborn's Applications for Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income; and (3) ORDERS that judgment in favor of the Commissioner issue forthwith. ENTERED this day of December, 2015. f(?West^ ITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?