Sanborn v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
23
ORDER ADOPTING 20 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; affirms the Commissioner's decision to deny Sanborn's Applications for Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income; orders that judgment in favor of the Commissioner issue forthwith. Signed by Honorable Lee R. West on 12/23/2015. (jb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
TROY SANBORN,
Plaintiff,
)
vs.
)
No. CIV-14-1342-W
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
ORDER
On October 26, 2015, United States Magistrate Judge Bernard M. Jones issued a
Report and Recommendation in this matter and recommended that the decision of the
defendant, Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security ("Commissioner"),
to deny disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income to plaintiff Troy
Sanborn be affirmed.
Sanborn was advised of his right to object to the Report and
Recommendation, s ^ Doc. 20 at 20, and the matter now comes before the Court on
Sanborn's Objection to the Magistrate's Report and Recommendation [Doc. 21] and the
Commissioner's Response to Plaintiffs Objection to the Magistrate's Report and
Recommendation [Doc. 22].
Upon de novo review of those findings challenged by Sanborn, the Court concurs
with Magistrate Judge Jones' suggested disposition of this matter. The Commissioner's
relevant factual findings are supported by substantial evidence in light of the entire record,
and she applied the correct legal standards. E.g.. O'Dellv. Shalala. 44 F.3d 855, 858 (lO**"
Cir. 1994).
Accordingly, the Court
(1) ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 20] issued on October 26,
2015;
(2) AFFIRMS the Commissioner's decision to deny Sanborn's Applications for
Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income; and
(3) ORDERS that judgment in favor of the Commissioner issue forthwith.
ENTERED this
day of December, 2015.
f(?West^
ITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?