Brown v. Farris et al

Filing 18

ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 17 Report and Recommendation.. Signed by Honorable Timothy D. DeGiusti on 6/13/2016. (mb)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

TRACEY EDWARD BROWN,
Petitioner,
v.
JIM FARRIS, et al.,
Respondents.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. CIV-15-29-D

ORDER
This matter is before the Court for review of the Report and Recommendation issued May
18, 2016, by United States Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B)
and (C). Judge Erwin recommends a denial of Mr. Brown’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus.
A review of the case file reflects that Petitioner has neither filed a timely objection to the
Report nor requested additional time to object, even though he was informed of the deadline and the
manner for filing an objection and the consequence of failing to object. Therefore, the Court finds
that Petitioner has waived further review of the issues addressed in the Report.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 17] is
ADOPTED in its entirety. Mr. Brown’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED. Because
no other matters remain pending, a separate judgment of dismissal shall be entered.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 13th day of June, 2016.