Rachel v. Troutt et al

Filing 92

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for 43 Motion to Dismiss, filed by Carl Pettigrew, 69 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Archie Rachel, 83 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment as to claims lodged against Defendant Pettigrew are DENIED. Defendant Pettigrews Motion To Dismiss is GRANTED and Defendant Pettigrew is relieved of his duty to respond to Plaintiffs motion to stay proceedings. Signed by Honorable David L. Russell on 8/11/16. (jw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA ARCHIE RACHEL, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY TROUTT, D.O.; TAMI GROGAN, Health Services Administrator; JANET DOWLING, Warden; GENESE MCCOY, Administrative Review Authority; CARL PETTIGREW, President of the Oklahoma Board of osteopathic Examiners; ALL SUED IN BOTH THEIR OFFICIAL AND INDIVIDUAL CAPACITIES, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CIV-15-141-R ORDER Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin. Doc. No. 83. No objection to the Report and Recommendation has been filed nor has an extension of time in which to object been sought or granted. Therefore, the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED in its entirety and Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment as to claims lodged against Defendant Pettigrew are DENIED. Defendant Pettigrew’s Motion To Dismiss is GRANTED and Defendant Pettigrew is relieved of his duty to respond to Plaintiff’s motion to stay proceedings. IT IS SO ORDERED this 11th day of August, 2016. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?