Woodson v. Corrections Corporation of America
Filing
7
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 6 Report and Recommendation.; denying 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Honorable Timothy D. DeGiusti on 05/15/15. (wh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
MARCUS D. WOODSON,
Plaintiff,
v.
CORRECTIONS CORP. OF AMERICA,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. CIV-15-422-D
ORDER
This matter is before the Court for review of the Report and Recommendation issued by
United States Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell [Doc. No. 8] pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
Judge Purcell recommends that Plaintiff’s Application for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis be
denied, and that this action be dismissed without prejudice unless Plaintiff pays the full $400 filing
fee within 20 days. This recommendation is based on findings that Plaintiff is subject to filing
restrictions under the “three strikes” provision of § 1915(g) and that his allegations are insufficient
to satisfy the “imminent danger” exception provided by the statute.
Plaintiff, who appears pro se, has not filed a timely objection or requested additional time
to object. Thus, the Court finds that Plaintiff has waived further review of the issues addressed by
Judge Purcell in his Report. See Moore v. United States, 950 F.2d 656, 659 (10th Cir. 1991); see
also United States v. 2121 East 30th Street, 73 F.3d 1057, 1060 (10th Cir. 1996).
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 6] is
ADOPTED in its entirety. Plaintiff’s Application for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis [Doc.
No. 2] is DENIED. Plaintiff shall pay the $400.00 filing fee for this action within 20 days from the
date of this Order. Failure to make full payment to the Clerk of Court by that date, or to show cause
for a failure to do so, will result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice to refiling.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 15th day of May, 2015.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?