Simpson v. Addison
Filing
8
ORDER adopting 5 Report and Recommendation; denying 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Honorable Timothy D. DeGiusti on 06/12/15. (wh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
GARY L. SIMPSON,
)
Petitioner,
v.
FNU ADDISON,
Respondent.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. CIV-15-537-D
ORDER
This matter is before the Court for review of the Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 5]
issued on May 19, 2015, by United States Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b)(1)(B) and (C). In the Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommended
that Petitioner’s Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis [Doc. No. 2] be denied.
Additionally, the Magistrate Judge recommended that the action be dismissed without prejudice to
refiling unless Petitioner paid the requisite $5.00 filing fee on or before June 8, 2015. The Magistrate
Judge specifically advised Petitioner of his right to object to the findings and recommendations set
forth therein. He further advised Petitioner that his failure to timely object would constitute a waiver
of his right to appellate review of the factual and legal matters in the Report and Recommendation.
Petitioner’s deadline for filing objections was June 8, 2015.
To date, Petitioner has not filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation or sought
an extension of time in which to do so. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and
Recommendation [Doc. No. 5] in its entirety and Petitioner’s Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma
Pauperis [Doc. Nos. 2] is DENIED.
The Court docket further reflects that Petitioner has now paid the $5.00 filing fee.
See Receipt for Payment [Doc. No. 6]. The Court finds Petitioner has complied with the Court’s
directive to pay the $5.00 filing fee, and, therefore, the matter shall proceed before Magistrate Judge
Purcell pursuant to the Court’s previous referral order [Doc. No. 4].
IT IS SO ORDERED this 12th day of June, 2015.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?