Lewis v. Colvin
ORDER ADOPTING 26 Report and Recommendation. The decision of dft Carolyn W Colvin, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, is REVERSED, & this matter is REMANDED to dft for further administrative proceedings pursuant to sentence four of § 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Signed by Honorable Stephen P. Friot on 12/21/2016. (llg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
COLLIN RAY LEWIS,
-vsCAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of the Social
Case No. CIV-15-584-F
On December 5, 2016, United States Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin issued
a Report and Recommendation, wherein he recommended that defendant’s decision
to deny plaintiff’s application for benefits under the Social Security Act be reversed
and that the case be remanded for further administrative development. Magistrate
Judge Erwin therein advised the parties of their right to object to the Report and
Recommendation by December 19, 2016, and further advised the parties that failure
to file a timely objection would result in waiver of the right to appellate review of the
factual and legal issues addressed.
To date, no objection to the Report and Recommendation has been filed, and
no request for an extension of time to file an objection has been filed. With no
objection being filed by either party within the time prescribed, the court accepts,
adopts, and affirms the Report and Recommendation in its entirety.
Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation issued by United States
Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin on December 5, 2016 (doc. no. 26) is ACCEPTED,
ADOPTED, and AFFIRMED. The decision of defendant, Carolyn W. Colvin,
Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, is REVERSED, and this
matter is REMANDED to the defendant for further administrative proceedings
pursuant to sentence four of § 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
Judgment shall issue forthwith.
DATED December 21, 2016.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?