Diel v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration

Filing 27

ORDER ADOPTING 24 Report and Recommendation. The decision of the Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration denying benefits is REVERSED. This case is REMANDED for further administrative proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation. Signed by Honorable Stephen P. Friot on 3/8/2017. (llg)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA JUDITH CAROL DIEL, Plaintiff, -vsNANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CIV-15-1043-F ORDER Plaintiff brings this action seeking judicial review of the Social Security Administration’s denial of disability insurance benefits. The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Bernard M. Jones, doc. no. 24, recommends that the Commissioner’s decision be reversed and that the case be remanded for further administrative proceedings consistent with the Report. The Commissioner has filed an objection to the Report. Doc. no. 25. Plaintiff has filed a response. Doc. no. 26. All objections are reviewed de novo. See, 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1) (court makes a de novo determination of those portions of the report to which objection is made). Having carefully considered the Commissioner’s objections, the court finds that it agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s detailed analysis and conclusions, that no purpose would be served by setting out further analysis here, and that the Report should be adopted. The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Jones is ACCEPTED, ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. The decision of the Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration denying benefits is REVERSED. This case is REMANDED for further administrative proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation, which the court has now adopted. IT IS SO ORDERED this 8th day of March, 2017. 15-1043p002.docx

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?