Gardner v. Commissioner of Social Security
ORDER ADOPTING 26 Report and Recommendation. The Social Security Administration's decision denying plf's applications for disability insurance & for SSI benefits is AFFIRMED. Signed by Honorable Stephen P. Friot on 3/7/2017. (llg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
-vsNANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
Case No. CIV-16-0233-F
Plaintiff Delisha Gardner filed this action seeking judicial review of the Social
Security Administration’s denial of her applications for disability insurance (DIB)
and supplemental security income (SSI) benefits under the Social Security Act.
Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin issued a Report and Recommendation on
February 13, 2017 (doc. no. 26), recommending that the court affirm the
Commissioner’s decision denying benefits. In his Report, the Magistrate Judge
advised the parties of their right to file objections by February 27, 2017, and advised
that failure to file timely objection to the Report would result in waiver of the right
to appeal the factual and legal issues addressed in the Report. Neither party has filed
an objection to the Report and neither party has requested an extension of time within
which to file any objection to the Report.
With no objection being filed, and having reviewed the Report, the record,
and the relevant arguments and authorities, the court finds that no purpose would be
served by setting out any further analysis here and that the Report should be adopted
in its entirety.
The court ACCEPTS, AFFIRMS and ADOPTS the findings and
recommendations of Magistrate Judge Erwin as stated in his Report and
Recommendation. The Social Security Administration’s decision denying plaintiff’s
applications for disability insurance and for supplemental security income benefits
IT IS SO ORDERED this 7th day of March, 2017.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?