McFarland v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
24
ORDER ADOPTING 23 Report and Recommendation. The Social Security Administration's final decision is AFFIRMED. Signed by Honorable Stephen P. Friot on 3/7/2017. (llg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
JEFFREY McFARLAND,
Plaintiff,
-vsNANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting
Commissioner Social Security
Administration,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. CIV-16-0449-F
ORDER
Plaintiff Jeffrey McFarland brings this action for judicial review of the
Defendant Acting Commissioner of Social Security’s (the Commissioner’s) final
decision that Mr. McFarland was not “disabled” under the terms of the Social
Security Act.
Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell issued a Report and
Recommendation on February 6, 2017 (doc. no. 23), recommending that the court
enter judgment affirming the Commissioner’s final decision. In her Report, the
Magistrate Judge advised the parties of their right to file objections by February 27,
2017, and advised that failure to make a timely objection to the Report waives the
right to appellate review of both factual and legal questions addressed in the Report.
Neither party has filed an objection to the Report and neither party has requested an
extension of time within which to file any objection to the Report. With no objection
being filed, and having reviewed the Report, the record, and the relevant arguments
and authorities, the court finds that no purpose would be served by setting out any
further analysis here and that the Report should be adopted in its entirety.
Accordingly, the court ACCEPTS, AFFIRMS and ADOPTS the findings
and recommendations of Magistrate Judge Mitchell as stated in her Report and
Recommendation.
The Social Security Administration’s final decision is
AFFIRMED.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 7th day of March, 2017.
16-0449p002.docx
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?