Reed v. Bryant et al

Filing 164

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Signed by Honorable Robin J. Cauthron on 11/13/19. A copy of the order was mailed to: Chad William Reed, #584428, HOLDENVILLE-DCF, C South #160, 6888 E 133rd Rd, Holdenville, OK 74848-9033. (wh)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
CHAD WILLIAM REED,
Plaintiff,
vs.
JASON BRYANT, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. CIV-16-461-C

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
This civil rights action brought by a prisoner, proceeding pro se, was referred to United
States Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell, consistent with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §
636(b)(1)(B). Judge Purcell entered a Fifth Supplemental Report and Recommendation on
October 17, 2019, recommending denial of Plaintiff’s Motion for Rule 54(b) Certification.
Plaintiff has timely objected. The Court therefore considers the matter de novo.
Despite the claims distinctions Plaintiff attempts to draw in his Objection, he fails to
show “no just reason for delay” of an appeal. Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b).
Accordingly, the Court adopts, in its entirety, the Report and Recommendation of the
Magistrate Judge (Dkt. No. 157), and for the reasons announced therein, denies Plaintiff’s
Motion for Rule 54(b) Certification (Dkt. No. 154.)
IT IS SO ORDERED this 13th day of November, 2019.