Lewis v. Oklahoma State of et al

Filing 9

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 7 and dismissing this action without prejudice for plaintiff's failure to follow the Court's Order. Signed by Honorable Vicki Miles-LaGrange on 8/10/2016. (ks)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA JOSEPH LONNELL LEWIS, Plaintiff, v. THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CIV-16-653-M ORDER On July 13, 2016, United States Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell issued a Report and Recommendation in this action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Magistrate Judge recommended that this action be dismissed for plaintiff’s failure to follow the Court’s orders. 1 Plaintiff was advised of his right to object to this Report and Recommendation by August 2, 2016. A review of the file reveals that no objection has been filed. Accordingly, upon de novo review, the Court: (1) ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation [docket no. 7] issued by the Magistrate Judge, and (2) DISMISSES this action without prejudice for plaintiff’s failure to follow the Court’s order. IT IS SO ORDERED this 10th day of August, 2016. 1 On June 17, 2016, plaintiff was advised that his initial documents were deficient in that he had not submitted an in forma pauperis application or paid the filing fee and, further, that his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cause of action was not on the proper form. Plaintiff was directed to cure the deficiencies by July 5, 2016. Plaintiff was advised that failure to follow the Court’s order would result in this matter being dismissed without prejudice. To date, plaintiff has failed to follow the Court’s order.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?